OK. Nearly everyone is angry about something. It’s a normal emotion. How people express it might not be normal, or could even be harmful. Like so many other blogs, this is mostly a venting exercise. I’m angry because good forestry provides an incredible amount of benefits to society. Yet, far too many ignoramuses believe that cutting trees is a bad thing. It’s perverse.
31 May 2011
Cutting Trees
There is nothing inherently wrong with cutting trees, as long as the harvest is done with science-based forestry practices in mind. At least not in North America. All forests and tree species require forest disturbance for regeneration. Forestry practices imitate these natural disturbances but happen without the negative consequences to humans and provide essentials for humans. "Natural" is not necessarily better. Management provides more "stuff" for people per unit area, and without the negative environmental consequences. Management also adds value (monetary and otherwise) to forests and helps keep forestlands intact (as opposed to urban splatter). A properly harvested forest, which includes clearcutting of certain forest types, is not harmful, evil, devastation, ruin, or any other undesirable outcome. The only possible downside is the change in visual quality, which is basically a selfish "me now" attitude. Get over it and think of someone else for a change.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)